Fórum AT e alguns temas afins à agenda de SST em destaque por aí ...
1. Resenhas e opiniões de autores sobre o livro “CASE, Anne; DEATON, Angus. Deaths of Despair and the Future of Capitalism.” Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 2020. 312 p.”. Destaco o texto em português. “Sonho ou pesadelo americano. Mortes por desespero e o futuro do capitalismo” (disponível aqui - https://www.scielo.br/j/tes/a/Jh3TQ5zJwWHK84FbThWcBjw/) de Raphael Mendonça Guimarães.
A busca com o título dá acesso a muita coisa sobre o tema.
2. Recém publicado artigo que é tb um desafio intelectual para todos nós que estudamos risco.
O título é “A framework for understanding risk based on the concepts of ontology and epistemology” (vejam arquivo aqui) e o resumo é
ABSTRACT
Two fundamental philosophical concepts of social science are ontology (idealism and realism), relating to what reality is, and epistemology (epistemological realism, epistemological idealism), relating to how one can obtain knowledge about that reality. These concepts are cornerstones in identifying, understanding, and describing core strategies in sociological theorizing (empiricism, substantialism, rationalism, and subjectivism). Similar philosophical concepts have been introduced and defined in risk science, to explain, assess and understand the risk concept. This paper studies and reconciles these two perspectives with the aim of obtaining new insights on how risks can be better understood, described, and communicated. Earlier work on this topic is extended by using contemporary risk science knowledge, as recently presented by the Society for Risk Analysis. The paper presents a framework for depicting the different ontological and epistemological stands in the risk domain. This framework can be useful for both theoretical and applied researchers studying risk.
3. Movimento sindical europeu discute cenários e estratégias para 2050.
Strategic foresight. Using the ETUI future scenarios for 2050 to respond more effectively to multiple crises. (https://www.etui.org/publications/strategic-foresight)
Novidades no Scandinavian Journal EEH
4. Editorial - How to improve intervention research on the psychosocial work environment? by Burdorf A (file:///C:/Users/ITAPAR/Downloads/311_313_editorial_2023_5%20(1).pdf)
5. Artigo discutido no editorial:
by Aust B, Møller JL, Nordentoft M, Frydendall KB, Bengtsen E, Jensen AB, Garde AH, Kompier M, Semmer N, Rugulies R, Jaspers SØ
This overview review covering 957 primary studies from 52 systematic reviews showed a moderate or high quality of evidence for effectiveness for four intervention approaches and two health outcomes. This suggests that the work environment and the health of employees can be improved by organizational-level interventions. More research, especially about implementation and context, is needed to further improve the evidence.
Results Of the 52 reviews, 30 studied a specific intervention approach and 22 specific outcomes. Regarding intervention approaches, we found strong quality of evidence for interventions focusing on “changes in working time arrangements” and moderate quality of evidence for “influence on work tasks or work organization”, “health care approach changes”, and “improvements of the psychosocial work environment”. Regarding outcomes, we found strong quality of evidence for interventions about “burnout” and moderate quality evidence for “various health and wellbeing outcomes”. For all other types of interventions, quality of evidence was either low or inconclusive, including interventions on retention.
- Efetue login ou registre-se para postar comentários
