Pular para o conteúdo principal
Início

Análise, prevenção e aspectos associados.

Menu de conta de usuário

  • Entrar
Saiba mais
Cadastre-se
Fale conosco

Main menu

  • INÍCIO
  • NOTÍCIAS
  • ENCONTROS
  • FÓRUNS
  • BIBLIOTECA

Trilha de navegação

  • Início
  • Publicação: Work constraints leads to accident: Questionnaire validity and a qualitative interpretation of the cutoff point

Publicação: Work constraints leads to accident: Questionnaire validity and a qualitative interpretation of the cutoff point

Enviado por: ialmeida
em Seg, 30/10/2017 - 10:18

A tese de Kleber dos Santos, orientando do prof Rodolfo AG Vilela com co-orientação da Profª Maria Regina A Cardoso foi premiada na Faculdade de Saúde Pública da USP e está se desdobrando em vários artigos de interesse para estudiosos do tema dos acidentes de trabalho.

Abaixo resumo de um desses artigos  "Work constraints leads to accident: Questionnaire validity and a qualitative interpretation of the cutoff point" de Kleber dos Santos, Maria Regina Alves Cardoso, Rodolfo Andrade Gouveia Vilela e Sayuri Tanaka Maeda.

French-speaking ergonomists conceive constraint as a work situation in which the worker has his power to act, think and decide reduced or hampered, which can facilitate the occurrence of work accidents. A questionnaire with five items was elaborated to measure constraint addressed to nursing staff members. From February to September 2013, a census was carried out at Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil, one of the biggest hospital complexes in the world. The census response rate was approximately 92%. The construct validity and criterion’s of the questionnaire was checked. After the former, four items remained, two of these measured time constraint and the other two Personal Protection Equipment constraint. The gold standards of the criterion validity were work accident involving exposure to biological fluid (WABIF) caused by sharp objects, WABIF through patient’s body fluid contact and work incident (or almost accident) involving these two kinds of WABIF. Criterion validity was performed with both Item Response Theory (IRT) and Classical Test Theory (CTT) paradigms using logistic regression. Only WABIF by contact and incident got criterion validity. The results of the IRT paradigm showed that it is possible to go beyond the CTT cutoff point and reach a more qualitative interpretation when a relationship is established between the cutoff point value and the b parameter value of the category of each item. Hence, we find the intensity of the item (represented by its category) sufficient to him/her being at that risk.

 

  • Efetue login ou registre-se para postar comentários

Visite nosso canal no Youtube
Fóruns

COVID-19

WebEncontros

Encontros
2025
Todos

 

Encontros
BIBLIOTECA
Destaques
Referências
PESQUISAS DO GRUPO
Pesquisas
Publicações
Em andamento
DECISÕES JUDICIAIS, PARECERES DE MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO E TEMAS RELACIONADOS

Rodapé

  • Fale conosco
Licença Creative Commons      Projeto TCI Art      Sobre tema W3CSS
Desenvolvido com Drupal